Judge allows lawsuit against Subway over alleged fake tuna to continue

[ad_1]

Subway-Bread-Ingredient
FILE - This Aug. 11, 2009, file photo, shows a chicken breast sandwich and water from Subway on a kitchen counter in New York. Subway says an ingredient dubbed the "yoga mat" chemical will be entirely phased out of its bread by the week of April 14, 2014. The disclosure comes as Subway has suffered from an onslaught of bad publicity since a food blogger petitioned the chain to remove the ingredient. (G3 Box News Photo/Seth Wenig, File) Seth Wenig

Judge allows lawsuit against Subway over alleged fake tuna to continue

Jenny Goldsberry
July 13, 12:49 PM July 13, 12:49 PM
Video Embed

A California judge ruled Monday that a lawsuit against Subway over its alleged artificial tuna can proceed.

Judge Jon Tigar of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that Subway can be sued over its claims that its tuna sandwich contains "100% tuna." This is the latest development in Karen Dhanowa and Nilima Amin's 2021 lawsuit against the sandwich maker, in which they allege the tuna is not real. A previous complaint over the same issue from Dhanowa and Amin was dismissed last October.

UCLA marine biologist Paul Barber performed tests on the sandwiches and found that they "partially or wholly lack tuna as an ingredient," instead containing "other fish species, animal products, or miscellaneous products aside from tuna." The New York Times also commissioned a test that did not detect tuna DNA in a sample.

'SNIP FOR SHAKE': FREE MILKSHAKES OFFERED TO CUSTOMERS SHOWING PROOF OF VASECTOMY

"Subway serves 100% tuna. We are disappointed the Court felt it couldn’t dismiss the plaintiffs’ reckless and improper lawsuit at this stage," a Subway representative said in a statement. "However, we are confident that Subway will prevail when the Court has an opportunity to consider all the evidence."

As a result of the allegations, Subway launched a website dedicated to proving its tuna is real. There, the restaurant disputes the New York Times's DNA test of the tuna, attributing the results to the fact that cooked tuna doesn't necessarily have the fish's original DNA. The site makes no mention of Barber's test.

"The truth is, Subway uses wild-caught skipjack tuna regulated by the Food and Drug Administration," the website reads. "A favorite among sub lovers, our tuna is and has always been high-quality, premium and 100% real."

G3 Box News

A Subway representative suggested that any product found in its tuna that is not real tuna could be the result of cross-contamination.

window.DY = window.DY || ; DY.recommendationContext = type: "POST", data: ['00000181-f836-dfae-a399-ff7efae50000'] ;
© 2022 Washington Examiner

[ad_2] https://g3box.org/news/world/judge-allows-lawsuit-against-subway-over-alleged-fake-tuna-to-continue/?feed_id=2393&_unique_id=62cefae0a9501

SHARE ON:

Hello guys, I'm Tien Tran, a freelance web designer and Wordpress nerd. Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae.

    Blogger Comment

0 comments:

Post a Comment